Andrus Park: erinevus redaktsioonide vahel

Eemaldatud sisu Lisatud sisu
Lai tänav (arutelu | kaastöö)
Resümee puudub
Resümee puudub
1. rida:
'''Andrus Park''' (1991.kuni aastani1991 '''Andrus Pork'''; [[17. detsember]] [[1949]] – [[14. august]] [[1994]]) oli eesti [[filosoof]] ja [[politoloog]].
 
Ta lõpetas [[Tartu ÜlikoolTRÜ|Tartu Riikliku Ülikooli]] 1973. aastal ajaloo ja filosoofia erialal. Kaitses 1973. aastal filosoofia kandidaadifilosoofiakandidaadi ja 1984. aastal doktorikraadi-doktori kraadi [[Vilnius]]es uurimuse eest, mis käsitles ajaloolist seletust.
 
EsimeneTa oli esimene Eesti sotsiaalteadlane, kes hakkas järjekindlalt avaldama oma töid rahvusvahelistes teadusajakirjades (esmalt [[ajaloofilosoofia]] teemadel ja hiljem [[politoloogia]] alal). Ta arendas välja rahvusvahelise tunnustuse pälvinud relativistlik-kausaalse seletuse kontseptsiooni ajaloofilosoofias.
1987. aastal valiti Andrus Park [[Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia]] korrespondentliikmeks.
 
==Olulisemaid töid==
Esimene Eesti sotsiaalteadlane, kes hakkas järjekindlalt avaldama oma töid rahvusvahelistes teadusajakirjades (esmalt [[ajaloofilosoofia]] teemadel ja hiljem [[politoloogia]] alal).
*Pork,1982 A.Andrus (1982)Pork. A note on schemes of historical explanation – problem of status. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 12(4), 409–413.
Arendas välja rahvusvahelise tunnustuse pälvinud relativistlik-kausaalse seletuse kontseptsiooni ajaloofilosoofias.
*Pork,1985 A.Andrus (1985)Pork. Assessing relative causal importance in history. History and Theory, 24(1), 62–69.
*Pork,1989 A.Andrus (1989a)Pork. The concept of ideological struggle – some Soviet interpretations. Government and Opposition, 24(3), 283–293.
**Andrus Pork, A. (1989b). Glasnost. Commentary, 87(6), 6–7.
**Andrus Pork, A. (1989c). The role of examples in social explanation – some problems of marxist interpretation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 19(1), 41–54.
*Pork,1990 A.Andrus (1990a)Pork. Global security and soviet nationalities. Washington Quarterly, 13(2), 37–47.
**Andrus Pork, A. (1990b). History, lying, and moral responsibility. History and Theory, 29(3), 321–330.
*Park,1991 A.Andrus (1991a)Park. From perestroika to cold civil-war – reflections on the soviet disintegration crisis. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 22(3), 257–264.
**Andrus Park, A. (1991b). Global security, glasnost and the retreat dividend. Government and Opposition, 26(1), 75–85.
*Park,1992 A.Andrus (1992a)Park. Gorbachev and the role of personality in history. Studies in Comparative Communism, 25(1), 47–56.
**Andrus Park, A. (1992b). The post-Soviet system of states. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 23(1), 11–16.
*Park,1993 A.Andrus (1993)Park. Ideological dimension of the postcommunist domestic conflicts. Communist and *Post-Communist Studies, 26(3), 265–276.
*Park,1994 A.Andrus (1994a)Park. Ethnicity and independence – the case of Estonia in comparative perspective. Europe-Asia Studies, 46(1), 69–87.
**Andrus Park, A. (1994b). Russia and Europe. Commentary, 98(2), 16–16.
**Andrus Park, A. (1994c). Turning-points of postcommunist transition – lessons from the case of Estonia. Government and Opposition, 29(3), 403–413.
*Park,1995 A.Andrus (1995)Park. Russia and Estonian security dilemmas. Europe-Asia Studies, 47(1), 27–45.
 
==Tunnustused==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Gellner Ernst Gellner] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Gellner] kirjutas tema kohta: “It is of course impossible to comment on the essay by (…) Andrus Park without speaking of his extremely tragic and terribly premature death. Andrus was a young man, whose combination of intellectual ability and integrity with great personal charm destined him to play a major part both in the life of Estonia and in the international world of thought and letters. His quiet charm and intellectual warmth has gained him many friends in London and Washington as well as in Tallinn and Tartu and Moscow. It is sad to have to say goodbye to him” [Gellner, E. (1994). Reply to critics. In J. A. Hall & I. Jarvie (Eds.), The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner (pp. 623-686). Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.].
*1987 [[Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia]] korrespondentliige
==Olulisemad tööd==
*Park, A. (1991a). From perestroika to cold civil-war – reflections on the soviet disintegration crisis. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 22(3), 257–264.
*Park, A. (1991b). Global security, glasnost and the retreat dividend. Government and Opposition, 26(1), 75–85.
*Park, A. (1992a). Gorbachev and the role of personality in history. Studies in Comparative Communism, 25(1), 47–56.
*Park, A. (1992b). The post-Soviet system of states. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 23(1), 11–16.
*Park, A. (1993). Ideological dimension of the postcommunist domestic conflicts. Communist and *Post-Communist Studies, 26(3), 265–276.
*Park, A. (1994a). Ethnicity and independence – the case of Estonia in comparative perspective. Europe-Asia Studies, 46(1), 69–87.
*Park, A. (1994b). Russia and Europe. Commentary, 98(2), 16–16.
*Park, A. (1994c). Turning-points of postcommunist transition – lessons from the case of Estonia. Government and Opposition, 29(3), 403–413.
*Park, A. (1995). Russia and Estonian security dilemmas. Europe-Asia Studies, 47(1), 27–45.
*Pork, A. (1982). A note on schemes of historical explanation – problem of status. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 12(4), 409–413.
*Pork, A. (1985). Assessing relative causal importance in history. History and Theory, 24(1), 62–69.
*Pork, A. (1989a). The concept of ideological struggle – some Soviet interpretations. Government and Opposition, 24(3), 283–293.
*Pork, A. (1989b). Glasnost. Commentary, 87(6), 6–7.
*Pork, A. (1989c). The role of examples in social explanation – some problems of marxist interpretation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 19(1), 41–54.
*Pork, A. (1990a). Global security and soviet nationalities. Washington Quarterly, 13(2), 37–47.
*Pork, A. (1990b). History, lying, and moral responsibility. History and Theory, 29(3), 321–330.
 
==Isiklikku==
Andrus ParkTa oli abielus [[Tiina Park|Tiina Pargiga]].
 
==Personaalia==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Gellner Ernst Gellner] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Gellner] kirjutas tema kohta: “It is of course impossible to comment on the essay by (…) Andrus Park without speaking of his extremely tragic and terribly premature death. Andrus was a young man, whose combination of intellectual ability and integrity with great personal charm destined him to play a major part both in the life of Estonia and in the international world of thought and letters. His quiet charm and intellectual warmth has gained him many friends in London and Washington as well as in Tallinn and Tartu and Moscow. It is sad to have to say goodbye to him” [Gellner, E. (1994). Reply to critics. In J. A. Hall & I. Jarvie (Eds.), The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner (pp. 623-686). Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.].
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Park, Andrus}}
[[Kategooria:Eesti filosoofid]]
[[Kategooria:Eesti politoloogid]]
[[Kategooria:Tartu Ülikooli ajaloo-keeleteaduskonna vilistlased]]
[[Kategooria:Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia liikmed]]
[[Kategooria:Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia liikmed]]
[[Kategooria:Tartu Ülikooli ajaloo-keeleteaduskonna vilistlased]]
[[Kategooria:Metsakalmistule maetud]]
[[Kategooria:Sündinud 1949]]