Vikipeedia:Üldine arutelu: erinevus redaktsioonide vahel
Eemaldatud sisu Lisatud sisu
Resümee puudub |
|||
554. rida:
Hoopis teine lugu on aga teise alateemaga. Toimetamismärkustega on küll vahel nii, et vaatad ja mõtled, et miks see peaks seal nüüd olema. Kas ehk artikli stiil on lisajale vastumeelne? Keelelisi vigu ei näe, aga malli (konflikti vältimiseks) ei taha ka maha võtma hakata.- [[Kasutaja:Melilac|Melilac]] ([[Kasutaja arutelu:Melilac|arutelu]]) 15. august 2015, kell 11:42 (EEST)
Greetings, I am trying to read the above discussion through google translate. I apologize if I get facts wrong.
* So, in the case of 20,000 revisions, we only need about 2,000 of them handcoded. We automatically label the other 18,000 since we are confident they are ok as those edits were never reverted, are made by admins or bots etc. This way we avoid bias.
* Quality assessment would help triage an existing problem. Bot would learn from the constant training as the quality standards increase over time. Training of this requires no volunteer time since we would use existing assessments. We can detect articles marked as good but had its quality deteriorate over time as well.
--<small> [[User:とある白い猫|とある白い猫]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:とある白い猫|chi?]]</sup> 21. august 2015, kell 21:06 (EEST)
==kriipsuskript==
| |||